Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Lawyer Tu Jahat Kalau Dia Bawa Kes Untuk Orang yang Bersalah

Let's say, if you are a lawyer

Say YES. I will present for you in court.

Say YES. I will present for you in court.

Say YES. I will present for you in court.


Why should you blame the lawyer. He has nothing to do in deciding the case.


WHAT ABOUT THIS?








Biasa dengar kan anggapan orang, kalau dalam sesuatu kes di mahkamah, lawyer yang bawa kes untuk tertuduh/defendan dianggap jahat. Sebabnya dia cuba membela orang yang salah. Kira macam nak cakap lawyer tu bersubahat sebab bela orang jahat. Lepas tu mak bapak lawyer tu pun akan marah dia sebab buat sesuatu yang salah. Tipikalnya memang macam tulah selalu.

Sebenarnya tanggapan tu salah. Cuba tengok contoh yang aku dah lukiskan tu. Antara doktor dan lawyer. Kalau lawyer di-blame sebab bawak kes untuk pesalah, doktor pun patut di-blame sebab selamatkan pembunuh.

Dan seorang lawyer yang bagus takkan bias dalam pilih client dia. Contohnya bila kes 3 orang India tu, dia taknak bawa tapi kes pakcik dia, dia nak. Tak boleh macam tu. Aku dapat gambaran benda ni dari lecturer aku, Prof As-Sagoff.

Rasa-rasa macam faham tak apa yang aku cuba nak sampaikan? Kalau korang punya persepsi terhadap lawyer sebelum ni adalah seperti apa yang aku cakap, sila ubah persepsi tu sebabnya tanggapan tu salah.

Labels: ,

41 comments:

  1. HanamarukuDecember 24, 2009 at 12:44 AM

    sumpah ingat kau amek gambar atas kat mane. rupe kau yang lukis. cantek ok! pakai paint ea? kalau aku dah jadi benang dah. satu ape pon tak nampak aku lukis.

    anyway, i used to have that kinda perspective- seorang lawyer tak sepatotnye amek client yg trang2 salah.But ape2 pon, what uve writen mmg btol and its relevant ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. zahirlunatikDecember 24, 2009 at 12:45 AM

    sebab tu aku mlas nk jd peguam..bukan psl aku x layak ok..heheh

    ReplyDelete
  3. aleenaDecember 24, 2009 at 12:53 AM

    lukisan tue syes cute sihh..

    ReplyDelete
  4. .Huda LunaDecember 24, 2009 at 1:24 AM

    sbb tu x brani jd lawyer..


    tp kn cntik lukis..
    huhu

    comel mcm tuan nye

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anis MohdDecember 24, 2009 at 2:13 AM

    hahaa
    semakin belajar law ,
    semakin anis rasa lawyer tu satu tugas mencbr .
    kan mili ..
    lawyer tu klo nak mng , kebanyakan nya mst gune cara2 licik kan . hurm ..

    ReplyDelete
  6. KhairulDecember 24, 2009 at 2:50 AM

    Aku anti anuar.
    Dari dulu hingga skrg, apa yang kebaikan yang dia da bt kat Malaysia.

    ReplyDelete
  7. atiqahdahalanDecember 24, 2009 at 3:31 AM

    ko ade kelas dgn Prof. As-sagoff?
    heard about him a lot. =)

    ReplyDelete
  8. NadieneDecember 24, 2009 at 7:58 AM

    memnah suke jd peguam,,, tapi kalu peguam syariah ok okt kan, heheheheh

    ReplyDelete
  9. ::FAIZ::December 24, 2009 at 8:58 AM

    Aku sedikit tak berapa faham lah cerita Hindustan ni.......

    ReplyDelete
  10. adey manisDecember 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM

    but still x adil bg pihak mangsa klu benar tertuduh tu yg rogol budak tu... cth budak tu mmg tau kelinng tu yg roggol die. tp die cume bdk. mne die tahu psl bukti2 nih. nk plk keling2 nih pndi carik alibi. ksian mgsa x dpt pmbelaan. senang jd peguam syariah je la huhuhu

    ReplyDelete
  11. intanurulfatehaDecember 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM

    .keje tu kn satu amanah
    .trime dan redha je la ;)

    ReplyDelete
  12. nurulhudalladdinDecember 24, 2009 at 11:51 AM

    comel la ko lukis mili..
    da mcm iklan TM da aku tengok..haha

    ReplyDelete
  13. saiful mohamedDecember 24, 2009 at 1:05 PM

    aku xpaham..klu bab2 mcm ni lemah aku.. =)

    ReplyDelete
  14. myracupcakeDecember 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM

    yup2 k.mili btol.org suke slh anggap kot ngan lawyer pdhl their do their best rite?gee~btw cntek la lukisn k.mili.heyh mira pun x bole bwt cm2!seriously cute ouh!

    ReplyDelete
  15. SizukaDecember 25, 2009 at 12:39 AM

    mama mia: peguam syariah pon same jugak dgn peguam biasa.

    contoh: defendan nak brcerai atas alasn wife dia curang. agak2 la kan betol ke wife dia curg? sbb wife dia pon boleh je cari alibi sendiri mgatakn husband dia buat fitnah.

    see, fact yang sama je. sape2 pon bole ckp dia xslah. n plaintif pon boleh je tuduh sape2 yang dia nak.

    so itu la function peguam dan mahkamah. peguam mnjalankan tugas cari bukti. tp sama ada bukti tu boleh pakai ke x, mahkamah yg tntukann. bukan peguam. dats y orang panggil hakim. sebab dia kene adil bagi judgment.. itu pon lepas dgr both side. btw,zaman nabi pon dgr dua belah pihak jgak sebelum buat keputusan..

    hah kan aku da mmbebel pnjg2. haha.

    ReplyDelete
  16. MunsyiDecember 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM

    seb baik amik law, kalo kaed..haha

    for me, lawyer tu salah bile defend org yg dh trang2 salah..mcm putar belit fakta atau create alibi palsu dsb..ape2 pon pkejaan tu, niat tu Allah je yg tau..

    ReplyDelete
  17. Meooo Comicore ClubDecember 25, 2009 at 2:49 AM

    sy suke sgt2 lukis nie...

    nk letak dlm blog sy bleh?

    sgt2 cool!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. AnonymousDecember 25, 2009 at 3:15 AM

    cakap prof tu semestinya betul
    kalau ko baca komen anis
    lawyer selalu guna cara licik nak menang

    mereka guna apa2 kekurangan dalam undang2 bagi menyokong hujah. ya undang2 tu bukan lengkap pun... ada jer compang camping kat sana sini

    apa yg penting ialah moral.

    dan prof itu mengabaikan satu perkara iaitu moral.

    bagi kes doktor plak dia x blh sama dengan peguam. dia x guna cara licik untuk selamatkan pesalah. dia cuma menyelamatkan nyawa tanpa ada niat untuk menang. doktor tidak bias. peguam ada bias

    akhir sekali, prof tak semestinya betul

    ReplyDelete
  19. AnonymousDecember 25, 2009 at 3:16 AM

    jarang aku komen panjang kan
    sekali sekala ler

    ReplyDelete
  20. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:09 PM

    @hannamaruku

    ye. aku gune paint. sumpah buruk. itu je bakat yg aku ada. aku sbnrnye nak ambik architecture bukan law tp sbb xterel math, dpt la course law.. hoho

    hurm,me too.b4 this. but the fact is, lawyer yg bwk kes utk org slh bukan defend tp just present.

    tenkiu for compliment btw =)

    ReplyDelete
  21. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:11 PM

    @zahirlunatik

    aku pn xnak jd peguam, apetah lagi prosecutor. aimed aku takat legal advisor je lps dah bljr law ni =)

    ReplyDelete
  22. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:12 PM

    @aleena

    okay tipu.. mcm tadika punye lukisan okayy..hahaha

    ReplyDelete
  23. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:13 PM

    @hudaluna

    setiap job ada cbrn die masing2..betul tak?

    thanx okey..masih belajar gune paint sbnrnye.. =)

    ReplyDelete
  24. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:15 PM

    @anis

    bukan lawyer je yg suke gune care licik..byk lagi keje lain yg licik jugak..contohnye peniage.sbnrnye setiap job tu kalo nak bersih, depends on masing2.

    misalkate anis jd lawyer 1 day, prevent urself from using any taktik kotor, okayy?

    but, xsuke org judge lawyer jahat based on their client,..sungguh tanggapan tu perlu diubah

    ReplyDelete
  25. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:16 PM

    @mr k

    itu cume contoh je. sebab kalau xde lawyer yg snggup bwk kes dia, mcmana nak setel.

    aku xsblh mana2 dlm politik ni. belum masanya utk memilih

    ReplyDelete
  26. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:17 PM

    @one munawwarah

    haritu ko kate kat jordan as-sagoff maknenye kambing kan? hehe. lecturer aku ni from singapore, bkn org mesia.

    ReplyDelete
  27. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:24 PM

    @fid

    peguam syariah scope cbrn dia lain.. peguam criminal scope cbrn dia lain. mana ada kerja yg xmancabar.betul x?

    ReplyDelete
  28. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:25 PM

    @faiz farish

    aku nak cakap xleh bias walaupun client tu india..wokayy?

    ReplyDelete
  29. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:27 PM

    @mamma mia

    betul tu. tp adil x adil tu judge yg tentukan. lgpun dlm islam sendiri kita xboleh tuduh tanpa bukti

    ReplyDelete
  30. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM

    @intanurulfateha

    betul sis..sgt setuju..tp belajar pun 1 amanah jugak kan?hehe

    ReplyDelete
  31. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:29 PM

    @nrlhdallddn

    huish, sgt2lah xlayak lukisan cabok ni nak dicompare dgn lukisan cute through my window yg sumpah buat semua org adore..hihi

    ReplyDelete
  32. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:30 PM

    @saypool

    meh aku nak pahamkan ko, aku cume nak bgtau, lawyer yg bwk kes utk pesalah, xbermakna lawyer tu jahat

    ReplyDelete
  33. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM

    @myra

    mmg ade lawyer yg jahat but xleh la nak blame semua kan??
    tenkiu myra,how's ur day after spm??all the best fer result nnti ye

    ReplyDelete
  34. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 12:48 PM

    @sizuka

    bagus keding. ko dah tlg explain bnde yg aku xdpt nak explain. peguam syariah pn sama je. peguam jugak. susah jd peguam, lagi susah bila ada persepsi yg buruk cmni

    ReplyDelete
  35. adiebah akashahDecember 25, 2009 at 2:38 PM

    kawan2 sekalian..buruknye tanggapan korang pada manusia yg bergelar peguam..cube fikirkan keadaan tanpa kehadiran mereka..mungkin senang korang nk cakap coz korang x involved dlm hal2 camneyh..adb cabar sape yg anti-lawyer tuh, jgn pernah sekali pon dlm idop gune khidmat mereka..let's try!adb nk tgok camne korang settleken SnP utk beli house,land or even bile involved in being charged or accident case..

    ReplyDelete
  36. MilimiloDecember 25, 2009 at 9:43 PM

    @me0188

    ambikla..xde charge dikenakan..link pn xpyh..free..huhu

    ReplyDelete
  37. MilimiloDecember 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM

    @ah fatt

    ye..setuju..prof xsemestinye betul.

    bout moral, ko masih nak kate lawyer yg bwk kes utk org berslah jht?

    mcm kes lina joy, lawyer die cume clearkan pd court yg article dlm constitution kite psl agama ni lemah. that's all,bukan die sokong lina joy tu murtad. plus dlm kes tu, ada 3 judge, 2 judge xsokong, 1 judge sokong.
    yg sokong tu pun non-muslim.

    mana2 scope kerja pun ada je org yg xbermoral. polis, doc, menteri.
    depends la ko nak stay dgn persepsi tu.

    ReplyDelete
  38. MilimiloDecember 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM

    @adieb

    tula psl adieb. scope kerja lawyer ade byk, bukan criminal case je tp tanggapan org dekat semua lawyer lebih focus dkt bnde2 jht je.

    teringat pulak mock trial yg case ayah Ana tu bunuh Ana. lawyer pade si bapak tu xde la pulak bwk bukti yg putar belit. everything is the fact of case.

    ReplyDelete
  39. MilimiloDecember 26, 2009 at 1:57 PM

    @munsyi

    dalam law,kita tak boleh judge seseorang tu slh b4 dia dibicarakan dan disahkan bersalah oleh hakim. apa hak seorang lawyer nak kata client dia salah tanpa kumpulkan bukti? dlm islam pun mesti ada bukti baru boleh tuduh org.

    mcm mana kalo client tu teraniaya? contoh dalam kes dadah. sbb dia takut sgt dia mengaku slh on behalf pihak lain. tp lawyer kena siasat dulu. kalo seorang lawyer yg ada persepsi cliche yg bulat2 terima apa yg client dia cakap, susah la kan?

    in the eyes of law, a people is innocent until proven guilty.

    ReplyDelete
  40. BOM321December 28, 2009 at 12:10 AM

    macam mana kita nak daftar (dot)com kat blogger yer? bayar guna paypal ke?

    ReplyDelete
  41. ddaoozeJanuary 20, 2010 at 4:08 AM

    cik milimilo..sebenarnya..ethics utk seorg health care practitioner (doc,nurse,bla2) yang first adalah safe life..tanpa mengira background,.yg len blakng kira..huhu

    ReplyDelete

SENYUM. Tak perlu kata apa-apa. SENYUM! :)

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)